Changes

:::::We don't know if Hay is a member or not.  If NAMBLA has a whole series of his material on their website, who is in what position to who here?  The history shows there would be no NAMBLA, i.e., an above ground organized movement, or as CPUSA members call it, the "open party" engaged in organizational and politcal activity.  And it is absoltulely clear that NAMBLA does much more than advocate issues of "sexual freedom".  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:57, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

:::::We don't know if Hay is a member or not.  If NAMBLA has a whole series of his material on their website, who is in what position to who here?  The history shows there would be no NAMBLA, i.e., an above ground organized movement, or as CPUSA members call it, the "open party" engaged in organizational and politcal activity.  And it is absoltulely clear that NAMBLA does much more than advocate issues of "sexual freedom".  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:57, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

::::::I'm not disputing that they're a bunch of lowlife sleazemeisters.  I'm just saying that if it's wrong for Pelosi to associate with them, it's equally wrong for Giuliani (and that the same sort of informational disclosure should be in his entry here).--[[User:WJThomas|WJThomas]] 15:57, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

::::::I'm not disputing that they're a bunch of lowlife sleazemeisters.  I'm just saying that if it's wrong for Pelosi to associate with them, it's equally wrong for Giuliani (and that the same sort of informational disclosure should be in his entry here).--[[User:WJThomas|WJThomas]] 15:57, 28 April 2007 (EDT)