Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
533
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + +
Debate:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality (view source)
Revision as of 21:25, May 7, 2017
, 21:25, May 7, 2017no edit summary
I think it would be incorrect to say that homosexuality is a "mental illness", and even if it were, personal liberty should always be taken into account. I don't think that any homosexuals want to be "cured", and if they do, and someone could make a cure, then let the gays decide. If the cure is genetically engineered, then I would say definitely no, because [[Abortion|messing with fetuses]] is pretty controversial.
I think it would be incorrect to say that homosexuality is a "mental illness", and even if it were, personal liberty should always be taken into account. I don't think that any homosexuals want to be "cured", and if they do, and someone could make a cure, then let the gays decide. If the cure is genetically engineered, then I would say definitely no, because [[Abortion|messing with fetuses]] is pretty controversial.
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
==No, not that important==
Takes millions or even billions of dollars research. Would be better spent researching cure for disease like Sickle-cell anemia, Huntington's, or Cystic fibrosis.--[[User:IluvAviation|IluvAviation]] ([[User talk:IluvAviation|talk]]) 17:25, 7 May 2017 (EDT)