Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,905
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 488:
Line 488: + + + + + + + + + +
→User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on liberalism. So,,,,: new section
::That makes sense. Thank you for your patience. It's sad what has happened to the Episcopal Church in recent years. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
::That makes sense. Thank you for your patience. It's sad what has happened to the Episcopal Church in recent years. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::You're welcome, and I agree. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
:::You're welcome, and I agree. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)
== User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on liberalism. So,,,, ==
User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on [[liberalism]].
The article needs major improvements.
I am not going to work on it due to time restraints. I spent a lot of time improving the liberal article.
I would use the same approach used with the liberal article. Clearly delineate liberalism from socialism/fascism because they are very substantially different (for example, Sweden vs. Communist China vs. Nazi Germany). But mention how the gap between the ideologies has narrowed in the United States. I don't keep up with European politics to know the situation there as far as the gap other than knowing that China has become more capitalistic. European countries commonly have more major political parties in a country so the situation is more difficult to keep tabs on. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:33, 9 May 2017 (EDT)