183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 533:
Line 533: + + + +
When is an amicus brief worth mentioning?
==logo==
==logo==
[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|logo]]
[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|logo]]
== When is an amicus brief worth mentioning? ==
[[User:Aschlafly]] [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&diff=133982&oldid=118651 added]] a mention of a case the ACLU filed an amicus brief in but did not represent the plaintiffs in; less than an hour later, he [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&diff=next&oldid=134031 removed]] all mention of racial equality cases with the edit summary "removed liberal bias; ACLU did not represent the plantiffs in Brown v. Board of Education". Is there any principle in use here other than "ACLU is bad"? --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 20:33, 28 April 2007 (EDT)