| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | | | |
| | ===Occam's duct tape=== | | ===Occam's duct tape=== |
| − | Also known as '''Occam's Krazy Glue''' or '''Occam's Stapler'''<ref>http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/discussion.php?id=oovi8sdv</ref>, this is pretty much the exact opposite of Occam's razor - it involves making as many unnecessary and irrelevant assumptions as possible. | + | Also known as '''Occam's Krazy Glue''' or '''Occam's Stapler'''<ref>http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/discussion.php?id=oovi8sdv</ref>, this is pretty much the exact opposite of Occam's razor – it involves making as many unnecessary and irrelevant assumptions as possible. |
| | | | |
| | ===Alder's razor=== | | ===Alder's razor=== |
| | {{main|Logical positivism}} | | {{main|Logical positivism}} |
| | | | |
| − | This razor was formulated by Mike Alder and is better known by its correct name, '''Newton's flaming laser sword'''. It says that whatever cannot be settled by experimentation is not worth debate.<ref>[[Hypocrisy|Interestingly enough, this very statement can't be tested by experimentation]], but whatever, y'know?</ref> | + | This razor was formulated by Mike Alder and is better known by its correct name, '''Newton's flaming laser sword'''. It says that whatever cannot be settled by experimentation is not worth debate.<ref>This statement itself cannot be tested by experimentation, likely making it an example of [[hypocrisy]].</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ===Crabtree's bludgeon=== | | ===Crabtree's bludgeon=== |
| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | {{cquote|Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.|||Robert J. Hanlon<ref>https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_J._Hanlon</ref>}} | | {{cquote|Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.|||Robert J. Hanlon<ref>https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_J._Hanlon</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | This one's self-explanatory. | + | This one is self-explanatory. |
| | | | |
| | ===Grice's razor=== | | ===Grice's razor=== |
| | {{cquote|As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations.|||Grice, we think?<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature/</ref>}} | | {{cquote|As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations.|||Grice, we think?<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature/</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | Basically, when in a conversation, prefer what the speaker meant over what the sentence she spoke literally meant. | + | Basically, when in a conversation, prefer what the speaker meant over what the sentence he/she spoke literally meant. |
| | | | |
| | ===Hume's razor=== | | ===Hume's razor=== |