SkipCaptcha
696
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: +
→Elvis Presley
:Personally, I think it's nice and compacts the encyclopedia. I've moved all the lost information to the [[Elvis Presley]] page.--Nathan--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 19:51, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
:Personally, I think it's nice and compacts the encyclopedia. I've moved all the lost information to the [[Elvis Presley]] page.--Nathan--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 19:51, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
::I'm trying to streamline the articles, and when I try to suggest things on talk pages they sometimes get ignored so I'm just thinking that doing it and correcting it in the case of error may be the best approach. I really don't think so many subpages with little different to offer from the main article is clean and may be confusing to readers. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 19:54, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
::I'm trying to streamline the articles, and when I try to suggest things on talk pages they sometimes get ignored so I'm just thinking that doing it and correcting it in the case of error may be the best approach. I really don't think so many subpages with little different to offer from the main article is clean and may be confusing to readers. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 19:54, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
::I was originally in favor of more subpages, but I think that all these articles on Elvis need to be streamlined because most of the information is already in the main article anyway, or at least moving it to one of the main subarticles. Three or so subarticles is fine, and an article on each movie is fine, but so many subarticles that differ little from the main article is unnecessary. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 19:51, 18 May 2017 (EDT)