Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Explanation
Line 2: Line 2:  
:Its been a few days since i posted the above suggestion, without any responses, positive or negative. I'm going to go ahead and change it, and if it gets reverted again i only ask that you explain to me why.
 
:Its been a few days since i posted the above suggestion, without any responses, positive or negative. I'm going to go ahead and change it, and if it gets reverted again i only ask that you explain to me why.
 
::So, I notice that it got reverted again...--[[User:Jasonb242|Jasonb242]] 16:16, 20 June 2011 (EDT)
 
::So, I notice that it got reverted again...--[[User:Jasonb242|Jasonb242]] 16:16, 20 June 2011 (EDT)
 +
:::Biased?  Of course it is.  It's Conservapedia - we have a conservative bias, which means that our articles can admit that the act was created to defend a sacred union.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 12:40, 24 May 2017 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,942

edits

Navigation menu