Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 280: Line 280:  
:::The article currently "take[s] a stance and make[s]" a pro-Muslim judgement. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:34, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
 
:::The article currently "take[s] a stance and make[s]" a pro-Muslim judgement. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:34, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
 
::::So, are you proposing deletion, retitling, or what? It's got nearly 400,000 hits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:04, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
 
::::So, are you proposing deletion, retitling, or what? It's got nearly 400,000 hits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:04, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::::If we are going to present both sides, how do we include these in a Conservapedia article? [http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/22/yes-real-donald-trump-is-a-muslim/] and [http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/18/politics/trump-obama-muslim-birther/index.html] and [http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/05/21/trump-slammed-hypocrite-bowing-saudi-king-smith-nr.cnn]?  This silly ugliness works both ways. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:10, 25 May 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
3,995

edits

Navigation menu