| | [[Confirmation bias]] often occurs when you set out to prove a position from the start rather than go where the evidence leads. The first portion of this article is a textbook example of the danger of allowing confirmation bias to negatively affect an articles quality. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:11, 26 May 2017 (EDT) | | [[Confirmation bias]] often occurs when you set out to prove a position from the start rather than go where the evidence leads. The first portion of this article is a textbook example of the danger of allowing confirmation bias to negatively affect an articles quality. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:11, 26 May 2017 (EDT) |
| | :As JDano expresses, we should take a nuetral stance. Many of the claims on both sides really stretch credulity. What does attending a funeral have to do with Christianity? Read you Bible back-and-forth, upside down, Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Esperanto, Polish, Yiddish, whatever. You will not find one single word, let alone phrase or verse that remotely suggests a believers standing in Christ has anything to do with honoring the dead. Yet this item appears in both the pro and con sections. In the pro section, it's number 1 on the list. In the con section, it's boldened. ,This page teaches us nothing about Christianity, let alone Islam. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 10:49, 26 May 2017 (EDT) | | :As JDano expresses, we should take a nuetral stance. Many of the claims on both sides really stretch credulity. What does attending a funeral have to do with Christianity? Read you Bible back-and-forth, upside down, Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Esperanto, Polish, Yiddish, whatever. You will not find one single word, let alone phrase or verse that remotely suggests a believers standing in Christ has anything to do with honoring the dead. Yet this item appears in both the pro and con sections. In the pro section, it's number 1 on the list. In the con section, it's boldened. ,This page teaches us nothing about Christianity, let alone Islam. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 10:49, 26 May 2017 (EDT) |
| − | ::RobS, previously I merely fired off my starboard evidential cannons that Obama may be an adherent of [[liberal Christianity]]. Today, I fired off the port evidential cannons indicating he may be a closet atheist or closet agnostic. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) | + | ::RobS, previously I merely fired off my starboard evidential cannons that Obama may be an adherent of [[liberal Christianity]]. Today, I fired off the port evidential cannons indicating he may be a closet atheist or closet agnostic. Today, the steamship "SS Obama is a Muslim according to Conservapedia" was scuttled. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) |