Changes

::Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here.  This article is just garbage.  Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the ''article''?  What do we learn when we read this?  Almost nothing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

::Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here.  This article is just garbage.  Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the ''article''?  What do we learn when we read this?  Almost nothing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

:::That's a very helpful comment, Human.  Not.  Rather than just mock and criticise, how about suggesting how it could be improved (with specifics), or point out precisely what is wrong with it.  To just dismiss it as having a YEC perspective indicates that rather than there being anything factually wrong with it, you simply have an ideological issue with it.  If so, that's your problem, not the article's.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:05, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

:::That's a very helpful comment, Human.  Not.  Rather than just mock and criticise, how about suggesting how it could be improved (with specifics), or point out precisely what is wrong with it.  To just dismiss it as having a YEC perspective indicates that rather than there being anything factually wrong with it, you simply have an ideological issue with it.  If so, that's your problem, not the article's.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:05, 29 April 2007 (EDT)