Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 313:
Line 313: + + + +
→TOC and header dispute: new section
:I think this entry hits a chord in part because some feel that one's religion is what one says it is, period. But nothing is what one says it is. There is an underlying reality that is often different from self-serving claims. [[God]] is not going to accept self-serving statements as being automatically true, and neither should we.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:39, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
:I think this entry hits a chord in part because some feel that one's religion is what one says it is, period. But nothing is what one says it is. There is an underlying reality that is often different from self-serving claims. [[God]] is not going to accept self-serving statements as being automatically true, and neither should we.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:39, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
::I agree with the premise Obama is a Muslim. But some of the "evidence" here is pretty lame. Sometimes less is more. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 11:42, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
::I agree with the premise Obama is a Muslim. But some of the "evidence" here is pretty lame. Sometimes less is more. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 11:42, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
== TOC and header dispute ==
There is a dispute, as seen in the page history, on whether to add a "TOC" below the section detailing the evidence in favor of Obama being a Muslim and with a header above that section (like what I did [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_Religion&diff=1347195&oldid=1347190 here]). I strongly support doing this because it makes the article more evenhanded, rather than making it seem like we're arguing that Obama is a Muslim (we should state facts and let the readers come to a conclusion through them). Also, the articles [[Liberal]] and [[Conservative]] do the same thing. This will not reduce the visibility of the "in favor" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:14, 27 May 2017 (EDT)