SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 348:
Line 348: +
→Making the article neutral: final decision please
::Folks, it is a factual entry on an encyclopedic topic. Efforts to downplay or dilute it will not work here. This is not Wikipedia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:07, 29 May 2017 (EDT)
::Folks, it is a factual entry on an encyclopedic topic. Efforts to downplay or dilute it will not work here. This is not Wikipedia.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:07, 29 May 2017 (EDT)
::::Dear Mr. Schalafly: In view of the hit that Conservapedia is taking with this article, we should decide on an editorial approach -- not a dilution of an approach. Do we follow Donald J. Trump in putting an end to the "Muslim rumor" or do we try to convince the reader that Obama is a Muslim? If we do the latter, we need some solid arguments, because as shown in [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?]] the current material is not convincing. Many thanks! [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:01, 29 May 2017 (EDT)
:::JDano, just keep finding facts that chisel away at the argument that Obama being Muslim. For example, I just added to the article that high retention rates for Muslim children (such as 1%) apply to areas with high Muslim concentrations. In the USA, Muslim retention rates are 76% for people raised Muslim.
:::JDano, just keep finding facts that chisel away at the argument that Obama being Muslim. For example, I just added to the article that high retention rates for Muslim children (such as 1%) apply to areas with high Muslim concentrations. In the USA, Muslim retention rates are 76% for people raised Muslim.