Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + + + + + + +
→Other uses
==Other uses==
==Other uses==
In addition to being a philosophy, anarchy can also be a description of a system in which there is no higher governmental authority. The world level of political interaction is considered anarchical, because there is no power over the sovereign states (i.e. there is no world government).
In addition to being a philosophy, anarchy can also be a description of a system in which there is no higher governmental authority. The world level of political interaction is considered anarchical, because there is no power over the sovereign states (i.e. there is no world government).
== Americans, anarchism and atheism ==
''See also:'' [[Sociology of "atheism is un-American" view]] and [[American atheism]]
Charles Louis Richter declared in his interview with the International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism (ISHASH) about [[American atheism|America and atheism]]:
{{Cquote|The turn of the century ended the [[Golden Age of Freethought|golden age of nineteenth century freethought]] with two events: the death of [[Robert G. Ingersoll|Robert Ingersoll]] in 1899, and the assassination of President [[William McKinley]] in 1901. The lack of a widely popular voice for irreligion, combined with the murder of the president by an anarchist, led to a backlash against not only anarchism but also atheism. From that point, Americans tended to see irreligion in terms of whatever ostensibly foreign ideology seemed most threatening. So for the rest of the century, we see atheism and atheists associated with anarchism, [[fascism]], [[socialism]], and of course [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]-style communism. By the late seventies, [[secular humanism]] became the buzzword for a whole suite of threats not only to religion, but to Americanism. It’s important to note that this phenomenon is not limited to the political or [[religious right]]; [[liberal]]s also framed irreligion as un-American.<ref>[https://atheismsecularismhumanism.wordpress.com/ ISHASH MEMBER INTERVIEW: CHARLES LOUIS RICHTER], International Society for Historians of Atheism, Secularism, and Humanism</ref>}}
==See also==
==See also==