| Line 350: |
Line 350: |
| | This is because you and I can have a reasonable arguement about the nature of ''g'' or we can argue about the properties of ''g'', but it's silly to say that ''g'' doesn't exist. Now that we finally agre on terminology, it might make sense to argue the properties of ''g''. | | This is because you and I can have a reasonable arguement about the nature of ''g'' or we can argue about the properties of ''g'', but it's silly to say that ''g'' doesn't exist. Now that we finally agre on terminology, it might make sense to argue the properties of ''g''. |
| | | | |
| − | I understand why you might think ''g'' is not sentient. Afterall, like a boulder rolling down a hill, ''g'' would appear to have no nervous system, nueral net or anything else which might sustain thought as we detect it in most brains. Please respect the conclusion that I have draw that is: if ''g'' is sentient then the level of intelligence is so far superior to our own that it would be almost incomprehensible. All of the things you see as normal, I see as miraculous. But there is no sense wasting time arguing about it. | + | I understand why you might think ''g'' is not sentient. Afterall, like a boulder rolling down a hill, ''g'' would appear to have no nervous system, nueral net or anything else which might sustain thought as we detect it in most brains. If ''g'' is sentient then the level of intelligence is so far superior to our own that it would be almost incomprehensible. All of the things you see as normal, I see as miraculous. But there is no sense wasting time arguing about it. I respect your right to analyze and postulate on true nature of ''g''. Please respect the conclusion that I have drawn. |
| | | | |
| − | I also tend to think that there is Unified Theory which still eludes us. The Unified Theory ties together light, energy, mass, time and ''g''. I think that if we had a greater understanding of ''g'' we could easily manipulate the other elements described above. I have limited and anecdotal evidence that this is possible, but I might just be superstitious. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:30, 29 April 2007 (EDT) | + | I have concluded that ''g'' is somehow part of a Unified Theory which still eludes our smartest minds. The Unified Theory ties together light, energy, mass, time and ''g''. I think that if we had a greater understanding of ''g'' we could easily manipulate the other elements described above. |
| | + | |
| | + | I believe this because I believe both the scientists and the philosophers. They both are experts in their fields. Neither party is dishonest. Additionally, I have limited and anecdotal and experiential evidence that this it is possible to affect ''g'' and to commune with ''g'' on some level. I rely upon the scientific method. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:30, 29 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | ==Let Me Paint a Picture== | | ==Let Me Paint a Picture== |