Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 470:
Line 470: + + +
→The future does not belong to those who insult the Prophet of Islam
::::(e) Nowhere is the success of Obama's recruiting speech for a mindless murderous ideology more apparent now (after the attacks on Charlie Hedbo, Pam Geller, and others) than [https://mobile.twitter.com/sean_spicier/status/870611024495468544 Kathy Griffin]. Obama's hatred of the West, Christianity, America, and white culture can't be whitewashed by more lies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:42, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
::::(e) Nowhere is the success of Obama's recruiting speech for a mindless murderous ideology more apparent now (after the attacks on Charlie Hedbo, Pam Geller, and others) than [https://mobile.twitter.com/sean_spicier/status/870611024495468544 Kathy Griffin]. Obama's hatred of the West, Christianity, America, and white culture can't be whitewashed by more lies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:42, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::Dear Brother-in-arms RobS: Please read the full text of the UN speech and then I am sure we can work a compromise out. Even if you pull that one sentence out of context it is still a leap. As it is now, we have a coherent bullet about the UN speech. If you want to do a separate bullet about Benghazi, you can try. Most conservatives have put Benghazi at the door of Hillary Clinton rather than President Obama. In effect, the bullet is arguing that "because bad things happened in Libya, Obama must be a Muslim." We are not talking about "Moderate rebels." Suppose Obama were a Christian, the UN speech is still advocating freedom of religion in the Arab world, and US foreign policy would still have the same externally imposed challenges. US foreign policy failures do not reflect the religious views of any one individual. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::Dear Brother-in-arms RobS: Please read the full text of the UN speech and then I am sure we can work a compromise out. Even if you pull that one sentence out of context it is still a leap. As it is now, we have a coherent bullet about the UN speech. If you want to do a separate bullet about Benghazi, you can try. Most conservatives have put Benghazi at the door of Hillary Clinton rather than President Obama. In effect, the bullet is arguing that "because bad things happened in Libya, Obama must be a Muslim." We are not talking about "Moderate rebels." Suppose Obama were a Christian, the UN speech is still advocating freedom of religion in the Arab world, and US foreign policy would still have the same externally imposed challenges. US foreign policy failures do not reflect the religious views of any one individual. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
I have read various explanations on why Gaddafi was killed. Here are a few additional ones not discussed on the talk page: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html?_r=0 and https://www.africanexponent.com/post/new-evidence-the-real-reason-gaddafi-was-killed-2706
I think the main reason why he was killed is that Clinton and many American politicians don't think enough moves ahead in their "political chess games". For example, what is going to happen to Iraq after Saddam Hussein is gone? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:43, 2 June 2017 (EDT)