| Line 470: |
Line 470: |
| | ::::(e) Nowhere is the success of Obama's recruiting speech for a mindless murderous ideology more apparent now (after the attacks on Charlie Hedbo, Pam Geller, and others) than [https://mobile.twitter.com/sean_spicier/status/870611024495468544 Kathy Griffin]. Obama's hatred of the West, Christianity, America, and white culture can't be whitewashed by more lies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:42, 2 June 2017 (EDT) | | ::::(e) Nowhere is the success of Obama's recruiting speech for a mindless murderous ideology more apparent now (after the attacks on Charlie Hedbo, Pam Geller, and others) than [https://mobile.twitter.com/sean_spicier/status/870611024495468544 Kathy Griffin]. Obama's hatred of the West, Christianity, America, and white culture can't be whitewashed by more lies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:42, 2 June 2017 (EDT) |
| | :::::Dear Brother-in-arms RobS: Please read the full text of the UN speech and then I am sure we can work a compromise out. Even if you pull that one sentence out of context it is still a leap. As it is now, we have a coherent bullet about the UN speech. If you want to do a separate bullet about Benghazi, you can try. Most conservatives have put Benghazi at the door of Hillary Clinton rather than President Obama. In effect, the bullet is arguing that "because bad things happened in Libya, Obama must be a Muslim." We are not talking about "Moderate rebels." Suppose Obama were a Christian, the UN speech is still advocating freedom of religion in the Arab world, and US foreign policy would still have the same externally imposed challenges. US foreign policy failures do not reflect the religious views of any one individual. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (EDT) | | :::::Dear Brother-in-arms RobS: Please read the full text of the UN speech and then I am sure we can work a compromise out. Even if you pull that one sentence out of context it is still a leap. As it is now, we have a coherent bullet about the UN speech. If you want to do a separate bullet about Benghazi, you can try. Most conservatives have put Benghazi at the door of Hillary Clinton rather than President Obama. In effect, the bullet is arguing that "because bad things happened in Libya, Obama must be a Muslim." We are not talking about "Moderate rebels." Suppose Obama were a Christian, the UN speech is still advocating freedom of religion in the Arab world, and US foreign policy would still have the same externally imposed challenges. US foreign policy failures do not reflect the religious views of any one individual. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:28, 2 June 2017 (EDT) |
| − | ::::::The problem begins with Obama's lie over the Benghazi massacre, which he carried a step further in that speech to blame innocent victims. There is no "context" to any speech based on self-propelled lies. There is no way to ever parse or whitewash what Obama said, or what he meant, or what he intended to mean. This phrase is akin to [[Adolf Eichmann]] saying he would "leap into the grave laughing knowing he was responsible for the death of 6 million Jews." This phrase needs to be emblazoned on Obama's tombstone. | + | ::::::The problem begins with Obama's lie over the Benghazi massacre, which he carried a step further in that speech to blame innocent victims. There is no "context" to any speech based on self-promulgated lies. There is no way to ever parse or whitewash what Obama said, or what he meant, or what he intended to mean. This phrase is akin to [[Adolf Eichmann]] saying he would "leap into the grave laughing knowing he was responsible for the death of 6 million Jews." This phrase needs to be emblazoned on Obama's tombstone. |
| | :::::: Obama should have just shut up after the media and Democrats bought his lies about the Benghazi massacre, but like all [[extremist]]s, he couldn't control himself and wanted to kick the opponents of jihad when they were down. He cannot undo the damage he's done to himself and his legacy, justifying - and encouraging - murder. Only Jesus can save him now. And although God may not require works for [[salvation]], other Christians might want to see evidence of a conversion before | | :::::: Obama should have just shut up after the media and Democrats bought his lies about the Benghazi massacre, but like all [[extremist]]s, he couldn't control himself and wanted to kick the opponents of jihad when they were down. He cannot undo the damage he's done to himself and his legacy, justifying - and encouraging - murder. Only Jesus can save him now. And although God may not require works for [[salvation]], other Christians might want to see evidence of a conversion before |
| | they believe an ''admitted'' and proven liar. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 18:57, 2 June 2017 (EDT) | | they believe an ''admitted'' and proven liar. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 18:57, 2 June 2017 (EDT) |