Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,244
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 488:
Line 488: + +
→The future does not belong to those who insult the Prophet of Islam
:::::It's pointless trying to salvage anything out of this speech. Obama is now dog meat. The speech has no meaningful context, and is loaded with buzz phrases, intended to stick and be repeated - to the whole world. You're time would be better served trying to paint Elizabeth Warren as the first female Messiah, or rehabilitating Hillary Clinton for another run. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 22:29, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::It's pointless trying to salvage anything out of this speech. Obama is now dog meat. The speech has no meaningful context, and is loaded with buzz phrases, intended to stick and be repeated - to the whole world. You're time would be better served trying to paint Elizabeth Warren as the first female Messiah, or rehabilitating Hillary Clinton for another run. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 22:29, 2 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::RobS, I am not trying to rehabilitate anyone, but rather come up with an article where the sources and statements match. CP can't pull one sentence from this speech to justify that Benghazi proves that Obama was a Muslim. Does Benghazi fall on Clinton's shoulders or was it due to Obama's religious beliefs? There are too many logical leaps that are taken from a single sentence in a speech. This is an encyclopedia not a rambling set of insults unrelated to the article topic or the sources in the footnotes. You may not like the UN speech, but it does not support what you are trying to say about it in the bullet. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 06:07, 3 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::RobS, I am not trying to rehabilitate anyone, but rather come up with an article where the sources and statements match. CP can't pull one sentence from this speech to justify that Benghazi proves that Obama was a Muslim. Does Benghazi fall on Clinton's shoulders or was it due to Obama's religious beliefs? There are too many logical leaps that are taken from a single sentence in a speech. This is an encyclopedia not a rambling set of insults unrelated to the article topic or the sources in the footnotes. You may not like the UN speech, but it does not support what you are trying to say about it in the bullet. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 06:07, 3 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::What is Benghazi? Your referring to a massacre. I'm referring to Obama's two statements: (1) on Sept. 12, 2012, murder of innocents occurred because of Muslim rage over insults to Mohammad; (2) on Sept. 25, 2012, "the future does not belong to those who insult the Prophet of Islam".
:::::::Retrospectively we know insults to the Prophet of Islam had nothing to do with the Benghazi massacre. We also know Obama knew this, yet he offered it as an explanation. But he went a step further with the deception, declaring it not only caused the massacre, it justified murder of in innocents in the future. That is the entire context, and undoubtably proves, by his own words and actions, Obama is in bed with jihad, and you can't be a jihadost without being a Muslim. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 09:14, 3 June 2017 (EDT)