Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 433: Line 433:  
|2009
 
|2009
 
|PG-13
 
|PG-13
−
|A movie with many destructive messages. The movie promotes [[environmentalism]] and [[feminism]] and claims that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The hero of the film also forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline also has hints of endorsing environmental terrorism, which James Cameron also indicated that he himself supported.
+
|A movie with many destructive messages. The movie promotes [[environmentalism]] and [[feminism]] and claims that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The hero of the film also forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline has hints of endorsing environmental terrorism, which James Cameron indicated that he himself supported.
 
|$760,507,625
 
|$760,507,625
 
|-
 
|-
Line 454: Line 454:  
| $100,292,856
 
| $100,292,856
 
|-
 
|-
−
|''Barnyard''
+
|''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals''
 
|2006
 
|2006
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Promotes disorderly conduct, portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid, and completely demonizes coyotes for being meat eating animals. A ferret character also converts to [[vegetarianism]]. Not only that but cows are shown to be male, when they should be bulls and there are brief scenes promoting alcohol and gambling.
+
|Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, it promotes disorderly conduct, portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid, and completely demonizes coyotes for being meat eating animals. A ferret character also converts to [[vegetarianism]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and gambling. On top of that, the movie is widely considered to have stolen much of its plot from the more conservative animation ''The Lion King''.
 
|$116,500,000
 
|$116,500,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 529: Line 529:  
|2014
 
|2014
 
|R
 
|R
−
|Downplays the role of the father. Mocks Conservative Christians and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking.
+
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, it downplays the importance a father has on a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking.
 
|$44,400,000
 
|$44,400,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 541: Line 541:  
|2012
 
|2012
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Unabashedly promotes feminism and demonstrates poor family values throughout. The men in the film are depicted as doofuses.
+
|Centered on a Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, one of Pixar's less memorable animations unabashedly promotes feminism and demonstrates poor family values throughout. The men in the film are depicted as doofuses.
 
|$540.4 million  
 
|$540.4 million  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 553: Line 553:  
|2005
 
|2005
 
|R
 
|R
−
|The film shows that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even cowboys.
+
|The film shows that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns.
 
|$83,043,761
 
|$83,043,761
 
|-  
 
|-  
Line 577: Line 577:  
|2003
 
|2003
 
|PG (Should be PG-13)
 
|PG (Should be PG-13)
−
|Bastardizes a harmless children's book by filling it with adult humor and pandering to focus groups. Is also the reason why the Seuss estate has a ban on any live action adaptations of Dr. Seuss's works.
+
|A bastardization of a harmless children's classic filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups. It is the reason why Dr. Seuss's family estate has banned any live action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry Award for "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)".
 
|$134 million
 
|$134 million
 
|-
 
|-
Line 739: Line 739:  
|1953
 
|1953
 
|Not rated
 
|Not rated
−
|Promotes cross-dressing and transsexualism.
+
|Created by Ed Wood, widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it promotes cross-dressing and transsexualism.
 
|N/A
 
|N/A
 
|-
 
|-
Line 757: Line 757:  
|1997
 
|1997
 
|R
 
|R
−
|Left-wing film made by Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]], as well as staring Matt Damon. Also notable as being the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American textbook ''A People's History to the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America, due to Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, telling [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene "You wanna read a ''real'' history book, read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”<ref>https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/</ref>
+
|Left-wing film made by left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]], as well as staring Matt Damon. Also notable as being the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American textbook ''A People's History to the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America, due to Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, telling [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene "You wanna read a ''real'' history book, read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”<ref>https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/</ref>
 
|$225,933,435  
 
|$225,933,435  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 781: Line 781:  
|2004
 
|2004
 
|R
 
|R
−
|The adventures of the pot-smoking duo that play up ethnic stereotypes.  
+
|The adventures of two pot-smokers who play up ethnic stereotypes.
 
|$18,250,550
 
|$18,250,550
 
|-
 
|-
SkipCaptcha
812

edits

Navigation menu