553
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: +
→Newton’s theory invalid
:: I still don't agree. Why don't you also say that relativity is invalid, because of dark energy or quantization? Maybe the reader could read Putnam's book and figure out what he meant, but to just declare that Newtonian gravity is invalid is very misleading. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:34, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:: I still don't agree. Why don't you also say that relativity is invalid, because of dark energy or quantization? Maybe the reader could read Putnam's book and figure out what he meant, but to just declare that Newtonian gravity is invalid is very misleading. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:34, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I refuse to continue any discussion with you until you apologize for your baseless accusations and personal attacks against me.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:43, 29 April 2007 (EDT)