Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 06:35, June 21, 2017

130 bytes added ,  06:35, June 21, 2017
→‎Irreducible Complexity: The whale is an extraordinarily unique sea-based mammal (see diagram above right), which has no plausible evolutionary ancestor.
Line 62: Line 62:  
#Lungs never would have had to develop unless the animal was already on land, in which case, they would die before reproducing.
 
#Lungs never would have had to develop unless the animal was already on land, in which case, they would die before reproducing.
 
#There is no explanation within the theory of evolution through natural selection for the mechanism in which a catapillar turns into a butterfly. Essentially the original animal is broken down and rearranged into a totally different animal, with no similar physical characteristics. This process cannot be explained within the theory, and points to a designer's involvement.
 
#There is no explanation within the theory of evolution through natural selection for the mechanism in which a catapillar turns into a butterfly. Essentially the original animal is broken down and rearranged into a totally different animal, with no similar physical characteristics. This process cannot be explained within the theory, and points to a designer's involvement.
 +
#The whale is an extraordinarily unique sea-based mammal (see diagram above right), which has no plausible evolutionary ancestor.
    
===Uncategorized===
 
===Uncategorized===
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,155

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1355435"

Navigation menu