188
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 271:
Line 271: + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 21:59, April 29, 2007
, 21:59, April 29, 2007no edit summary
I love the nice accurate new version. I give it five minutes before it's reverted.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 17:22, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
I love the nice accurate new version. I give it five minutes before it's reverted.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 17:22, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
**Yeah, it didn't last long, which is stupid because it was much more correct.[[User:Ifixthings|Ifixthings]] 17:43, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
**Yeah, it didn't last long, which is stupid because it was much more correct.[[User:Ifixthings|Ifixthings]] 17:43, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Oh Ed Poor... You make me an sad panda, those corrections you made are quite horrible. The version by Ifixthings was a good one, and the missing citations could be corrected quite fast, allready found several good and reliable sources. Wikintrepeter atleast fixed the most outrageous claims. But still some are left like: "However, the UN offers no proof of a scientific consensus on the subject" Still at least 30 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries support the claim and only one to my knowlage opposes it, that being American Association of Petroleum Geologists. And to be honest, them opposing it isn't really suprising. Im seriously baffled how one can deny the scientific consensus here, and seeing what i claim to be intellectual dishonesty makes me really sad, as this is something which will directly affect our lives and if not ours then atleast our childrens. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 17:59, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
== Celsius ==
== Celsius ==