Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,940
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: − + − +
→"Every single other editor disagrees with you. Even SamHB changed his position."
About John McCain: The fact that he said something that you disagree with doesn't really give you good cause to censor his statements or call him a RINO. If anything that any Conservapedia editor disagrees with got censored, what kind of web site would this place be? And dismissing anyone you disagree with as a RINO (or XINO or PLINO, etc.) is really stupid. It might interest you to know that the [[RINO]] page once listed nearly the entire Republican Senate delegation: [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO&diff=1065203&oldid=1065202]]. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed. (The [[XINO]] page doesn't present Conservapedia in a very good light either.) [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:15, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
About John McCain: The fact that he said something that you disagree with doesn't really give you good cause to censor his statements or call him a RINO. If anything that any Conservapedia editor disagrees with got censored, what kind of web site would this place be? And dismissing anyone you disagree with as a RINO (or XINO or PLINO, etc.) is really stupid. It might interest you to know that the [[RINO]] page once listed nearly the entire Republican Senate delegation: [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO&diff=1065203&oldid=1065202]]. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed. (The [[XINO]] page doesn't present Conservapedia in a very good light either.) [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 13:15, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
:I can agree with everything about the tweet except it being a public threat against a government official. It was a threat against a criminal leaker who formerly occupied the chief position in a largest federal law enforcement agency in the US.
:I can agree with everything about the tweet except it being a public threat against a government official. It was a threat against a criminal leaker who formerly occupied the chief position in the largest and formerly most respected law enforcement agency of the federal government.
:As yo MCCain, he and Pelosi are both soon headed for greener pastures, that's the consensus internally in both parties. Out of respect to the decades they've given in service to their respective parties, we should ignore everything they say and do in thhis the period of obvious decline of their mental capacities. The problem the Democrats have however, is a limited bench of substitute talent and leadership. We just need to remain patient momentarily, and not make the embarrassment for either an worse than what it is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:24, 27 June 2017 (EDT)
:As to MCCain, he and Pelosi are both soon headed for greener pastures, that's the consensus internally in both parties. Out of respect to the decades they've given in service to their respective parties, we should ignore everything they say and do in thhis the period of obvious decline of their mental capacities. The problem the Democrats have however, is a limited bench of substitute talent and leadership. We just need to remain patient momentarily, and not make the embarrassment for either an worse than what it is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 13:24, 27 June 2017 (EDT)