Changes

:I can agree with everything about the tweet except it being a public threat against a government official. It was a threat against a criminal leaker who formerly occupied the chief position in the largest and formerly most respected law enforcement agency of the federal government.

:I can agree with everything about the tweet except it being a public threat against a government official. It was a threat against a criminal leaker who formerly occupied the chief position in the largest and formerly most respected law enforcement agency of the federal government.

:As to MCCain, he and Pelosi are both soon headed for greener pastures, that's the consensus internally of both parties. Out of respect for the decades they've given in service to their respective parties, we should ignore everything they say and do in this the period of obvious decline of their mental capacities. The problem the Democrats have however, is a limited bench of substitute talent and leadership. We just need to remain patient momentarily, and not make the embarrassment for either any worse than what it is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]} 13:24, 27 June 2017 (EDT)

:As to MCCain, he and Pelosi are both soon headed for greener pastures, that's the consensus internally of both parties. Out of respect for the decades they've given in service to their respective parties, we should ignore everything they say and do in this the period of obvious decline of their mental capacities. The problem the Democrats have however, is a limited bench of substitute talent and leadership. We just need to remain patient momentarily, and not make the embarrassment for either any worse than what it is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]} 13:24, 27 June 2017 (EDT)

::@SamHB:I stand corrected about what you meant. However, you did concede, as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fake_news&diff=1356577&oldid=1356576 your comment above] makes clear. Every other editor agrees with me that the WH tapes info is not appropriate here. It has been added to [[White House tapes]], so deleting it here is not censorhip.

::@SamHB:I stand corrected about what you meant. However, you did concede, as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fake_news&diff=1356577&oldid=1356576 your comment above] makes clear. Every other editor agrees with me that the WH tapes info is not appropriate here. It has been added to [[White House tapes]], so deleting it here is not censorship.

::Every other editor also agreed with me that McCain's opinion should not be added here. I actually opposed adding his opinion mainly because is was giving undue weight to one opinion.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356266&oldid=1356265] The fact that McCain is a RINO (liberal people and RINOs like to mention people like McCain and Graham to "prove" that there is "conservative" opposition to conservatives like Trump, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz. If you want a better explanation of why I oppose adding comments like this, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&diff=1354355&oldid=1354353 this diff], where I explain why Linsay Graham's opinion was not necessary for an article. Either add sources that give wide analyses of people's opinions ("''Some conservatives/liberals/etc think...''"), or add multiple specific opinions from people with different views. Otherwise, keep it out.

::Every other editor also agreed with me that McCain's opinion should not be added here. I actually opposed adding his opinion mainly because is was giving undue weight to one opinion.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356266&oldid=1356265] The fact that McCain is a RINO (liberal people and RINOs like to mention people like McCain and Graham to "prove" that there is "conservative" opposition to conservatives like Trump, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz. If you want a better explanation of why I oppose adding comments like this, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&diff=1354355&oldid=1354353 this diff], where I explain why Linsay Graham's opinion was not necessary for an article. Either add sources that give wide analyses of people's opinions ("''Some conservatives/liberals/etc think...''"), or add multiple specific opinions from people with different views. Otherwise, keep it out.

::I don't think I'm the only one who believes McCain to be a RINO. Trump if probably the first GOP presidential nominee since Reagan to actually be conservative (based on what he did in office and on his positions relative to the other candidates -- Jeb Bush, Kasich, Rubio, or some other establishment favorite were expected to win). Here is more proof McCain is a RINO: [http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/332721-senate-rejects-repeal-of-obama-drilling-rule] His "Nay" vote was unexpected (the others were) and he single-handedly defeated a measure to repeal an Obama energy regulation. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:36, 27 June 2017 (EDT)

::I don't think I'm the only one who believes McCain to be a RINO. Trump if probably the first GOP presidential nominee since Reagan to actually be conservative (based on what he did in office and on his positions relative to the other candidates -- Jeb Bush, Kasich, Rubio, or some other establishment favorite were expected to win). Here is more proof McCain is a RINO: [http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/332721-senate-rejects-repeal-of-obama-drilling-rule] His "Nay" vote was unexpected (the others were) and he single-handedly defeated a measure to repeal an Obama energy regulation. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:36, 27 June 2017 (EDT)