SkipCaptcha
696
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 848:
Line 848: + + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 02:57, June 29, 2017
, 02:57, June 29, 2017→Random question: new section
In terms of how the project was designed/structured, I already voiced my objection to the project so there was little to achieve there. Looking back, I should have either gone into this with a positive attitude or just not gotten involved again. After all is said and done, in the way I went about it, little to nothing was achieved by me commenting on this matter again . [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:59, 12 April 2017 (EDT)
In terms of how the project was designed/structured, I already voiced my objection to the project so there was little to achieve there. Looking back, I should have either gone into this with a positive attitude or just not gotten involved again. After all is said and done, in the way I went about it, little to nothing was achieved by me commenting on this matter again . [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:59, 12 April 2017 (EDT)
== Random question ==
I see that only the Protestant canon is included. I'm curious as whether the additional books in the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox canons are ever going to be included? Sure, this may be a tall order seeing that the other Old Testament books have yet to be finished, but is this something that is ever going yo be considered? --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 22:57, 28 June 2017 (EDT)