SkipCaptcha
696
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 854:
Line 854: +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 16:09, June 29, 2017
, 16:09, June 29, 2017→Random question
:Good point. I'm open to including other [[Old Testament]] books. I think the [[New Testament]] is complete, right?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:Good point. I'm open to including other [[Old Testament]] books. I think the [[New Testament]] is complete, right?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:38, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
::Yes, the New Testament is complete. Several Old Testament books are also complete. I recommend pulling the original source from the "KJV with Apocrypha" whenever possible to remain consistent with the rest of the project. This could really be of value to Catholic/Orthodox readers, and even some of the Protestant Reformers said that these books are good to read even if not canonical.--[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 12:09, 29 June 2017 (EDT)