Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,773 bytes added ,  19:13, June 30, 2017
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
::::It is very hard to take creationists seriously when they talk about creationism, a subject for which there is no credible evidence. I am well aware of the ardent creationists who have graduated from Ivy league institutions. The fact that their opinions about biology do not appear in reputable peer-reviewed science journals is telling. If Dr Brown and Dr Jeanson are so wonderful, why can’t they get their creationist ideas published by reputable science publications? It seems we are straying from the original topic. Why can’t my critics cite a reference that states what is written in the article? I’m not asking for much. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 14:48, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 
::::It is very hard to take creationists seriously when they talk about creationism, a subject for which there is no credible evidence. I am well aware of the ardent creationists who have graduated from Ivy league institutions. The fact that their opinions about biology do not appear in reputable peer-reviewed science journals is telling. If Dr Brown and Dr Jeanson are so wonderful, why can’t they get their creationist ideas published by reputable science publications? It seems we are straying from the original topic. Why can’t my critics cite a reference that states what is written in the article? I’m not asking for much. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 14:48, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::::I have found that talking to many evolutionists is like talking to a brick wall. There is plenty of evidence for a young earth view of the earth, and I can direct you to the websites [https://answersingenesis.org/ answersingenesis.org], [http://www.icr.org/ icr.org], and [http://creation.com/ creation.com]. However, whether one accepts creation or evolution depends on their philosophical convictions and presuppositions rather than the amount of evidence that exists.
 +
:::::[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/do-creationists-publish-in-notable-refereed-journals/ Creationists do publish in mainstream scientific journals]. The reason why not more of tem do is because of secular intolerence for creationists. For example, a peer-reviewed paper that merely mentioned the word "creator" was severely mocked and people called for the journal to be boycotted.[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-study-paper-creator-intelligent-design-plos-one-creatorgate-a6910171.html][https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/secularist-intolerance-against-scientific-paper-briefly-mentions-creator/] Additionally, Scientific American was about to hire an experienced science writer who wrote for other notable publications, but refused to hire him after finding out he was a creationist.[https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/science-magazine-refuses-to-hire-creationist/] Do you really think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth (aka. refute everything they were taught in school about how the universe came to be)? Also, see [[Biblical creation journals]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I concur.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:06, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I concur.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:06, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu