88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + Line 21:
Line 23: +
no edit summary
:::::I have found that talking to many evolutionists is like talking to a brick wall. There is plenty of evidence for a young earth view of the earth, and I can direct you to the websites [https://answersingenesis.org/ answersingenesis.org], [http://www.icr.org/ icr.org], and [http://creation.com/ creation.com]. However, whether one accepts creation or evolution depends on their philosophical convictions and presuppositions rather than the amount of evidence that exists.
:::::I have found that talking to many evolutionists is like talking to a brick wall. There is plenty of evidence for a young earth view of the earth, and I can direct you to the websites [https://answersingenesis.org/ answersingenesis.org], [http://www.icr.org/ icr.org], and [http://creation.com/ creation.com]. However, whether one accepts creation or evolution depends on their philosophical convictions and presuppositions rather than the amount of evidence that exists.
:::::[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/do-creationists-publish-in-notable-refereed-journals/ Creationists do publish in mainstream scientific journals]. The reason why not more of tem do is because of secular intolerence for creationists. For example, a peer-reviewed paper that merely mentioned the word "creator" was severely mocked and people called for the journal to be boycotted.[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-study-paper-creator-intelligent-design-plos-one-creatorgate-a6910171.html][https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/secularist-intolerance-against-scientific-paper-briefly-mentions-creator/] Additionally, Scientific American was about to hire an experienced science writer who wrote for other notable publications, but refused to hire him after finding out he was a creationist.[https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/science-magazine-refuses-to-hire-creationist/] Do you really think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth (aka. refute everything they were taught in school about how the universe came to be)? Also, see [[Biblical creation journals]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/do-creationists-publish-in-notable-refereed-journals/ Creationists do publish in mainstream scientific journals]. The reason why not more of tem do is because of secular intolerence for creationists. For example, a peer-reviewed paper that merely mentioned the word "creator" was severely mocked and people called for the journal to be boycotted.[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-study-paper-creator-intelligent-design-plos-one-creatorgate-a6910171.html][https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/secularist-intolerance-against-scientific-paper-briefly-mentions-creator/] Additionally, Scientific American was about to hire an experienced science writer who wrote for other notable publications, but refused to hire him after finding out he was a creationist.[https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/science-magazine-refuses-to-hire-creationist/] Do you really think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth (aka. refute everything they were taught in school about how the universe came to be)? Also, see [[Biblical creation journals]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::I couldn’t care less about creationist websites; point me to reputable publications where the writer can present evidence for creationism. It’s that simple. I know creationists publish in mainstream science journals. But I do not know of any mainstream science journal that publishes creationism. Why? Lack of evidence, it’s that simple. Do I ‘think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth’? Of course they would, as long as the researcher provided the evidence. Once again, it’s that simple.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:47, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:I concur.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:06, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:I concur.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:06, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I still believe I complied with the commandments by removing an opinion (propaganda) and updating the number of signatories. I’m complying with the rules yet I’m being given a load of crap. Bizarre.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:24, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I still believe I complied with the commandments by removing an opinion (propaganda) and updating the number of signatories. I’m complying with the rules yet I’m being given a load of crap. Bizarre.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:24, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::In case you did not see, I actually changed the wording a while ago to make it more acceptable for both of us. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:28, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::In case you did not see, I actually changed the wording a while ago to make it more acceptable for both of us. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:28, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::: I noticed, a lot of fuss was made for such a small change that actually made the article comply with the commandments. The opening sentence is now completely factual and referenced.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:47, 30 June 2017 (EDT)