Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,381
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 83:
Line 83: − +
→Project Steve is ultimately an "argument from voting". Voting will cause the death of evolutionism
::::GinnyS, I don't have online discussions with "glancers". I have discussions with sincere people who wish to engage in dialogues and be reasonably informed about what they are discussing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::GinnyS, I don't have online discussions with "glancers". I have discussions with sincere people who wish to engage in dialogues and be reasonably informed about what they are discussing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
By the way, the world's most ardent/famous advocate of evolutionism is arguably [[Richard Dawkins]]. Recently, he lost massive amount of web traffic (see: [[Alexa rankings of Richard Dawkins' website]]).
By the way, the world's most ardent/famous advocate of evolutionism is arguably [[Richard Dawkins]]. After July 2011, he lost a massive amount of his web traffic (see: [[Alexa rankings of Richard Dawkins' website]]).
His rapid lost of influence and web traffic happened about a year after ''Ms. Magazine'' cited Conservapedia indicating that the vast majority of his web visitors were men. And then the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy happened and his rapid demise began (the controversy involved a battle between Dawkins and feminists).
His rapid lost of influence and web traffic happened about a year after ''Ms. Magazine'' cited Conservapedia indicating that the vast majority of his web visitors were men. And then the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy happened and his rapid demise began (the controversy involved a battle between Dawkins and feminists).