Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
→Origin of name
:::::[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/do-creationists-publish-in-notable-refereed-journals/ Creationists do publish in mainstream scientific journals]. The reason why not more of tem do is because of secular intolerence for creationists. For example, a peer-reviewed paper that merely mentioned the word "creator" was severely mocked and people called for the journal to be boycotted.[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-study-paper-creator-intelligent-design-plos-one-creatorgate-a6910171.html][https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/secularist-intolerance-against-scientific-paper-briefly-mentions-creator/] Additionally, Scientific American was about to hire an experienced science writer who wrote for other notable publications, but refused to hire him after finding out he was a creationist.[https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/science-magazine-refuses-to-hire-creationist/] Do you really think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth (aka. refute everything they were taught in school about how the universe came to be)? Also, see [[Biblical creation journals]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::[https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/do-creationists-publish-in-notable-refereed-journals/ Creationists do publish in mainstream scientific journals]. The reason why not more of tem do is because of secular intolerence for creationists. For example, a peer-reviewed paper that merely mentioned the word "creator" was severely mocked and people called for the journal to be boycotted.[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientific-study-paper-creator-intelligent-design-plos-one-creatorgate-a6910171.html][https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/secularist-intolerance-against-scientific-paper-briefly-mentions-creator/] Additionally, Scientific American was about to hire an experienced science writer who wrote for other notable publications, but refused to hire him after finding out he was a creationist.[https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/science-magazine-refuses-to-hire-creationist/] Do you really think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth (aka. refute everything they were taught in school about how the universe came to be)? Also, see [[Biblical creation journals]]. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:13, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::I couldn’t care less about creationist websites; point me to reputable publications where the writer can present evidence for creationism. It’s that simple. I know creationists publish in mainstream science journals. But I do not know of any mainstream science journal that publishes creationism. Why? Lack of evidence, it’s that simple. Do I ‘think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth’? Of course they would, as long as the researcher provided the evidence. Once again, it’s that simple.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:47, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::I couldn’t care less about creationist websites; point me to reputable publications where the writer can present evidence for creationism. It’s that simple. I know creationists publish in mainstream science journals. But I do not know of any mainstream science journal that publishes creationism. Why? Lack of evidence, it’s that simple. Do I ‘think secular journals would let people who believe in a young earth publish papers that give evidence for a young earth’? Of course they would, as long as the researcher provided the evidence. Once again, it’s that simple.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 15:47, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::Many (not all, of course) articles on those websites are essentially research journal papers. Go on an see for yourself (I personally recommend AiG's website). Pick a topic. Besides, there are peer reviewed [[Biblical creation journals|journals that are run by creationists]]. Are those not enough for you? These papers are on creationist websites and journals, rather than in a secular journal, because the secular journals are not going to accept anything advocating for creationism (even mentioning the word "creator" in a non-religious sense can get you in hot water). I would like to see an evolutionist actually seriously consider the evidence and arguments of creation science, rather than looking at a 10-year-old blog and a 70-year-old book and then saying there is no evidence. You can't refuse to look at the evidence creationists present and then say there is no evidence. You must at least look at what they have to present if you want to honestly promote evolution. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:31, 1 July 2017 (EDT)
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
Please remember the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 and #5: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable." "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry." [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:58, 30 June 2017 (EDT)