188
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 291:
Line 291: + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 23:00, April 29, 2007
, 23:00, April 29, 2007no edit summary
:::::I've asked you twice for proof of this. I ask you here one last time. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:33, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::I've asked you twice for proof of this. I ask you here one last time. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:33, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Sigh. Did you read what I wrote on your talk page or not? Almost every single author of the reports(and I listed a few as examples) is a respected scientist and there are about 40 authors to each report. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 18:51, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Sigh. Did you read what I wrote on your talk page or not? Almost every single author of the reports(and I listed a few as examples) is a respected scientist and there are about 40 authors to each report. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 18:51, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::Found atleast [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686 this] as an partial answer to the question here and above, alltho the report is allready quite old and rapid progres has been made during few years, even at year 2000 this study didnt found '''any''' studyes that disagreed with the consensus. That should allready tell something. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:00, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
== Celsius ==
== Celsius ==