Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + + +
Page structure- new section
::::Dear 1990sguy, if you read the message from User:SamHB, it is clear that there is still disagreement. What is your view on the four examples that I listed above? Please give us your considered views, as these matters are not just a matter of "black and white". Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:46, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
::::Dear 1990sguy, if you read the message from User:SamHB, it is clear that there is still disagreement. What is your view on the four examples that I listed above? Please give us your considered views, as these matters are not just a matter of "black and white". Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:46, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::SamHB conceded to me and the others that the info about the Comey tapes should not be added here. And if it is not clear, Andy also agrees with me on these disputes. And what does the above have to do with this article? Can you prove to me that the MSM accepted rumors of Comey tapes as fact? In this case, they only reported that rumors existed. The BuzzFeed dossier, the retracted CNN article, and the two articles Comey revealed as false during the hearing are clearly different from that and fake news. The MSM believed them to be true, but used sloppy reporting motivated, at least in part, due to bias. As I stated on the other article talk page, the view of fake news that I am advocating is more broad than yours. It encompasses your version as well as other types of false news. You, however, apparently, want to adopt a narrow version of fake news, the version that is friendly to the MSM.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356244&oldid=1356243][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356601&oldid=1356589] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:05, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::SamHB conceded to me and the others that the info about the Comey tapes should not be added here. And if it is not clear, Andy also agrees with me on these disputes. And what does the above have to do with this article? Can you prove to me that the MSM accepted rumors of Comey tapes as fact? In this case, they only reported that rumors existed. The BuzzFeed dossier, the retracted CNN article, and the two articles Comey revealed as false during the hearing are clearly different from that and fake news. The MSM believed them to be true, but used sloppy reporting motivated, at least in part, due to bias. As I stated on the other article talk page, the view of fake news that I am advocating is more broad than yours. It encompasses your version as well as other types of false news. You, however, apparently, want to adopt a narrow version of fake news, the version that is friendly to the MSM.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356244&oldid=1356243][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fake_news&diff=1356601&oldid=1356589] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 15:05, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
== Page structure ==
Personally, there is much more to this topic then what is currently on display. I don't particularly like the liberal view or the conservative view sections. Modern or historical is somewhat worthy but there really has never been an era in which people were not calling out falsehoods e.g. The earth was flat, The Sun was the center of the universe. I will be contributing more to this page on the basis of fake news is fraudulent, used to drive agendas. Fake news attempts to manipulate the public, dupe them in order to advance a cause. Hands up don't shoot and the many instances from CNN (very fake news), Gulf of Tonkin, Goebbels work, State media, science and Global Warming, homosexuality among the animal species and those powerful people that decide what is news and what isn't. A long, long list of topics to explore and highlight. This should lead to the elimination of some sub sections. Feel free to weigh in. --Jpatt 14:05, 4 July 2017 (EDT)