Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,398 bytes added ,  05:54, July 6, 2017
no edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:  
::Guy: We agree on something, Trump doesn’t care about miners.
 
::Guy: We agree on something, Trump doesn’t care about miners.
 
::Conservative: I agree, Australia is not a developing country. Remember what I said in the original edit that has since been altered and moved? ‘Coal still dominates in Australia … though renewable power generation is steadily increasing.’ That statement and what I said above is true. Australia does not consider coal to be a cheap energy source nowadays and renewable energy generation is more economical and slowly expanding. [https://www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/policy-advocacy/reports/clean-energy-australia-report.html]  --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 00:15, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::Conservative: I agree, Australia is not a developing country. Remember what I said in the original edit that has since been altered and moved? ‘Coal still dominates in Australia … though renewable power generation is steadily increasing.’ That statement and what I said above is true. Australia does not consider coal to be a cheap energy source nowadays and renewable energy generation is more economical and slowly expanding. [https://www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/policy-advocacy/reports/clean-energy-australia-report.html]  --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 00:15, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
−
:::GinnyS, according to you: Coal still dominates in the developed country of Australiia, but it is not cheap and renewable energy is more economical. So according to you, a large portion of a developed country is acting against their economic interest despite the fact that it hurts their business profits, etc.  In addition, according to youo: coal is expanding in the USA which is one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world despite coal not being cheap and renewable energy being more economical. I hope you understand why I am skeptical. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:26, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
+
:::GinnyS, according to you: Coal still dominates in the developed country of Australiia, but it is not cheap and renewable energy is more economical. So according to you, a large portion of a developed country is acting against their economic interest despite the fact that it hurts their business profits, etc.  In addition, according to youo: coal is expanding in the USA which is one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world despite coal not being cheap and renewable energy being more economical. I hope you understand why I am skeptical.
 +
 
 +
:::I believe that a big reason why liberals are anti-coal is due to [[global warming]] alarmism. So many false predictions have been pushed by these alarmists that they lack credibility. The truth is that climate scientists/meteorologists often have difficulty forecasting even a year ahead or even a week ahead. In the 1970s, climate alarmists pushed the supposed grave upcoming crisis of [[global cooling]]. The global cooling scare was a big joke. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:34, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
::::@GinnyS: I never said Trump does not care about coal miners. I was talking about the globalist politicians like Hillary Clinton. Trump has clearly shown himself to be for coal miners. You may think his solutions won't work (I think they will work), but he clearly cares about coal miners. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:26, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::::Guy: You mentioned Clinton and Trump prior to saying this: ‘These politicians don't want to help coal miners…’ What should I think?--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
According to the [[National Academy of Sciences]], "Of all the fossil-fuel sources, coal is the least expensive for its energy content..."[http://needtoknow.nas.edu/energy/energy-sources/fossil-fuels/coal/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:38, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
:Con: Your link says nothing about coal.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
::GinnyS, your comment to me is vague. Second, even if your comment was clearer, the current version of the article is acceptable/correct.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::Con: Ah, now I see the link, silly of me to miss it. Noticed how you completely glossed over the criticisms of coal in the article you linked. In reference to your recent edits to the article, why are you using a blog as a reference? Why not use a scholarly reference instead of a blog that slobbers all over Trump? If Trump is so good to the coal industry, why didn’t he insist the steal used on the pipelines that worm their way through our country use American coal and iron? I wish I’d never got involved with updating this article; you’re turning it into a mess with the political propaganda.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 01:54, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
88

edits

Navigation menu