88
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: +
no edit summary
:Con: Your link says nothing about coal.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
:Con: Your link says nothing about coal.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
::GinnyS, your comment to me is vague. Second, even if your comment was clearer, the current version of the article is acceptable/correct.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
::GinnyS, your comment to me is vague. Second, even if your comment was clearer, the current version of the article is acceptable/correct.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, 5 July 2017 (EDT)
:::Con: Ah, now I see the link, silly of me to miss it. Noticed how you completely glossed over the criticisms of coal in the article you linked. In reference to your recent edits to the article, why are you using a blog as a reference? Why not use a scholarly reference instead of a blog that slobbers all over Trump? If Trump is so good to the coal industry, why didn’t he insist the steal used on the pipelines that worm their way through our country use American coal and iron? I wish I’d never got involved with updating this article; you’re turning it into a mess with the political propaganda.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 01:54, 6 July 2017 (EDT)