Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 420: Line 420:     
:If they aren't allowed, I guess they aren't allowed. Don't know why they were created in the first place, if they weren't going to be anything more than junk. Must admit, some of them did have some conservative principles. Also, wouldn't pro-War, being the opposite of anti-War, be Conservative while the latter's more liberal? Just asking... [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:38, 9 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:If they aren't allowed, I guess they aren't allowed. Don't know why they were created in the first place, if they weren't going to be anything more than junk. Must admit, some of them did have some conservative principles. Also, wouldn't pro-War, being the opposite of anti-War, be Conservative while the latter's more liberal? Just asking... [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:38, 9 July 2017 (EDT)
−
::I don't see the point of having a "Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies" and then having a big list of articles that are debatable. Newspapers don't publish "Best vacation spots" or "Best stocks to buy" and then have a big list of debatable contenders.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:30, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
+
::I don't see the point of having a "Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies" and then having a big list of movies that are debatable. Newspapers don't publish "Best vacation spots" or "Best stocks to buy" and then also include a big list of debatable contenders.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:30, 10 July 2017 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956

edits

Navigation menu