Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Conservative or Liberal?: new section
The idea behind net neutrality is to stop ISP's from shaping and throttling internet traffic. Although government control wouldnt really work, I think this article misinforms the readers. Right now ISPs can shape their traffic, so a site like say... Wikipedia would load faster than CP. [[User:GDurkin|GDurkin]] 00:07, 8 January 2011 (EST)
The idea behind net neutrality is to stop ISP's from shaping and throttling internet traffic. Although government control wouldnt really work, I think this article misinforms the readers. Right now ISPs can shape their traffic, so a site like say... Wikipedia would load faster than CP. [[User:GDurkin|GDurkin]] 00:07, 8 January 2011 (EST)
== Conservative or Liberal? ==
Hi.
Just want to know, is Net Neutrality Conservative or Liberal? The article here on Conservapedia indicates that Net Neutrality is inherently liberal/left-wing. But on the other hand, those asking for net neutrality indicate that removing it would be a liberal value in itself, hence the confusion. I'll quote the pop-up I'm getting on the forum Pokecommunity (short for Pokémon Community):
"This is the web without net neutrality.
Cable companies want to get rid of net neutrality. Without it, '''sites like ours could be censored, slowed down, or forced to charge extra fees.''' We can stop them and keep the Internet open, fast, and awesome if we all contact Congress and the FCC, but we only have a few days left. Learn more."
And there's the full message:
"https://www.battleforthenet.com/#widget-learn-more"
Like I said, the whole thing seems confusing, since BOTH options seem to sound very liberal/left-wing. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:46, 12 July 2017 (EDT)