Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
98 bytes added ,  00:25, July 13, 2017
re
Line 19: Line 19:     
I see that it was only for two hours, but it was still undue. He only removed the delete notice at the top of an article, after he stated on the deletion page that he believed the page should remain. It is more appropriate to simply message him and tell him that he should not have deleted the notice. The reason is that Anglican is an established and good faith editor, and when an editor is blocked, that block goes on their permanent record. Only block when absolutely necessary, such as if he continued to remove the delete notice without any discussion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:21, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
 
I see that it was only for two hours, but it was still undue. He only removed the delete notice at the top of an article, after he stated on the deletion page that he believed the page should remain. It is more appropriate to simply message him and tell him that he should not have deleted the notice. The reason is that Anglican is an established and good faith editor, and when an editor is blocked, that block goes on their permanent record. Only block when absolutely necessary, such as if he continued to remove the delete notice without any discussion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:21, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I Agree with User:1990sguy on this matter. Block vandals only.--Jpatt 20:25, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu