Gish took part in over 300 formal debates against evolutionists during his life.<ref name="MorrisICR"/> Due to his effective debating skills and knowledge on the [[creation vs. evolution debate]], Gish was referred to as "creation’s bulldog".<ref name="MorrisICR"/> Critics coined the term "Gish Gallop" when referring to his debating. Gish was viewed as the winner of his debates by friend and foe alike based on audience reaction.<ref name="ankerberg.com">Ankerberg Theological Research Institute, ''Truth in Advertising: Damaging the Cause of Science'', by Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm]</ref> So profound was Gish's impact on the debate scene, that [[evolution]]ary websites posted articles stating not how to debate Creationists in general, but instead how to specifically debate Duane Gish. Dr. [[Henry Morris]] wrote of Dr. Gish, saying, "at least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences, he always wins."<ref name="ankerberg.com"/> | Gish took part in over 300 formal debates against evolutionists during his life.<ref name="MorrisICR"/> Due to his effective debating skills and knowledge on the [[creation vs. evolution debate]], Gish was referred to as "creation’s bulldog".<ref name="MorrisICR"/> Critics coined the term "Gish Gallop" when referring to his debating. Gish was viewed as the winner of his debates by friend and foe alike based on audience reaction.<ref name="ankerberg.com">Ankerberg Theological Research Institute, ''Truth in Advertising: Damaging the Cause of Science'', by Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm]</ref> So profound was Gish's impact on the debate scene, that [[evolution]]ary websites posted articles stating not how to debate Creationists in general, but instead how to specifically debate Duane Gish. Dr. [[Henry Morris]] wrote of Dr. Gish, saying, "at least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences, he always wins."<ref name="ankerberg.com"/> |