Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + +
→Take a factual approach to her personal life and religion and use reliable sources.: re
:::A reasonable approach is to incorporate both the Christian Post and Forbes material above. RonaldB and others should hammer out factual wording based on those two reliable sources. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:11, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
:::A reasonable approach is to incorporate both the Christian Post and Forbes material above. RonaldB and others should hammer out factual wording based on those two reliable sources. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:11, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I put a reference to the nearly nude photoshoots back in: Hopefully it is written in such a way so that the readers can make their own judgments. It's important not to whitewash the truth like Wikipedia does. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 10:24, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
::::I put a reference to the nearly nude photoshoots back in: Hopefully it is written in such a way so that the readers can make their own judgments. It's important not to whitewash the truth like Wikipedia does. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 10:24, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
I don't find you addition bringing any value to the article. I am pretty sure every swimsuit model is nearly nude. Now if you are intent on highlighting hypocrisy, your entry makes sense but really? --Jpatt 11:05, 14 July 2017 (EDT)