Changes

Indeed 1990sguy has been stalking me today.  He systematically reverts my changes without reading them.  He judges edits based on the amount of bytes changed rather than seeing the good editing leads to fewer bytes to say the same idea in a less wordy, confusing way. Please tell him to stop and be considerate. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:18, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

Indeed 1990sguy has been stalking me today.  He systematically reverts my changes without reading them.  He judges edits based on the amount of bytes changed rather than seeing the good editing leads to fewer bytes to say the same idea in a less wordy, confusing way. Please tell him to stop and be considerate. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:18, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:@JDano: I am not stalking you. I am reverting edits I legitimately think are bad. You are adding liberal bias into articles. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361005&oldid=1351490 You called "constitutional carry" a "propaganda term".] And you added language casting a negative light on it.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361043&oldid=1361042] If you stopped adding liberal bias to articles and stopped constantly reverting me without going to the talk page, I would not do what you call "stalking." --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:25, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:@JDano: I am not stalking you. I am reverting edits I legitimately think are bad. You are adding liberal bias into articles. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361005&oldid=1351490 You called "constitutional carry" a "propaganda term".] And you added language casting a negative light on it.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361043&oldid=1361042] If you stopped adding liberal bias to articles and stopped constantly reverting me without going to the talk page, I would not do what you call "stalking." --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:25, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

::In addition, JDano, you frequently mention on issue in your edit summaries, when you actually make numerous changes. When I revert you, giving a reason, you revert me back without explaining why I was wrong. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361030&oldid=1361029 This edit] was made well into the edit war, but you did not explain why you supported these edits, even though I made myself clear in previous edits that I opposed these changes. In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361039&oldid=1361035 this edit], you write as your edit summary "moved a bit on the capitalization", but you make the same edits I opposed. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361032&oldid=1361031 Here], you stated that because I strongly opposed your edits, I should not edit the article. I have seen similar behavior from you in multiple other articles ([[fake news]], [[travel ban]], [[Donald Trump achievements]]). I want to work with you, but how can I with this behavior? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:30, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

::In addition, JDano, you frequently mention on issue in your edit summaries, when you actually make numerous changes. When I revert you, giving a reason, you revert me back without explaining why I was wrong. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361030&oldid=1361029 This edit] was made well into the edit war, but you did not explain why you supported these edits, even though I made myself clear in previous edits that I opposed these changes. In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361039&oldid=1361035 this edit], you write as your edit summary "moved a bit on the capitalization", but you make the same edits I opposed. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Constitutional_carry&diff=1361032&oldid=1361031 Here], you stated that because I strongly opposed your edits, I should not edit the article. I have seen similar behavior from you in multiple other articles ([[fake news]], [[travel ban]], [[Donald Trump achievements]]). I want to work with you, but how can I with this behavior? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:30, 14 July 2017 (EDT

::By my definition, you are stalking / hounding me.  I go to a page and start editing it.  Each time I go back to make the next batch of changes, I find that you mindlessly have reverted the edits that I have made so far.  If you find yourself having strong feelings or your ego has become engaged while working on Conservapedia, go take a break or work on something else.  I am not "adding liberal bias" to articles.  Sometimes less is more.  We are here to write an encyclopedia that is free of the liberal bias found on Wikipedia.  We are not hear to grind any political axe.  If I finish revising an article and then someone comes along with a different viewpoint in terms of how the article is to be presented, I will discuss it calmly on the talk page.  There is no point in going to the talk page in the middle of the editing.  I also note that you did not leave any talk page comments today.  Again, I would ask my long-time colleague JPatt to read the diffs from today. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:37, 14 July 2017 (EDT)