Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
452 bytes added ,  16:19, July 14, 2017
Line 169: Line 169:  
:::By my definition, you are stalking / hounding me.  I go to a page and start editing it.  Each time I go back to make the next batch of changes, I find that you mindlessly have reverted the edits that I have made so far.  If you find yourself having strong feelings or your ego has become engaged while working on Conservapedia, go take a break or work on something else.  I am not "adding liberal bias" to articles.  Sometimes less is more.  We are here to write an encyclopedia that is free of the liberal bias found on Wikipedia.  We are not hear to grind any political axe.  If I finish revising an article and then someone comes along with a different viewpoint in terms of how the article is to be presented, I will discuss it calmly on the talk page.  There is no point in going to the talk page in the middle of the editing.  I also note that you did not leave any talk page comments today.  Again, I would ask my long-time colleague JPatt to read the diffs from today. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:37, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:::By my definition, you are stalking / hounding me.  I go to a page and start editing it.  Each time I go back to make the next batch of changes, I find that you mindlessly have reverted the edits that I have made so far.  If you find yourself having strong feelings or your ego has become engaged while working on Conservapedia, go take a break or work on something else.  I am not "adding liberal bias" to articles.  Sometimes less is more.  We are here to write an encyclopedia that is free of the liberal bias found on Wikipedia.  We are not hear to grind any political axe.  If I finish revising an article and then someone comes along with a different viewpoint in terms of how the article is to be presented, I will discuss it calmly on the talk page.  There is no point in going to the talk page in the middle of the editing.  I also note that you did not leave any talk page comments today.  Again, I would ask my long-time colleague JPatt to read the diffs from today. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:37, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::So, calling constitutional carry a "propaganda" term, deleting a factual explanation of its legal basis and putting a statement stating it causes "confusion", and arbitrarily labeling Breitbart articles opinion sources is not adding liberal bias? And contrary to what you stated, me reverting your edits has '''nothing''' to do with myself or my "ego". I legitimately think your edits are bad, and relateively few people edit CP, if someone is going to correct those edits, it has to be me. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:41, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::So, calling constitutional carry a "propaganda" term, deleting a factual explanation of its legal basis and putting a statement stating it causes "confusion", and arbitrarily labeling Breitbart articles opinion sources is not adding liberal bias? And contrary to what you stated, me reverting your edits has '''nothing''' to do with myself or my "ego". I legitimately think your edits are bad, and relateively few people edit CP, if someone is going to correct those edits, it has to be me. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:41, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
Maybe it appears that I am taking sides. But I watched you on multiple occasions messing with 1990sguy edits. So yes he is doing the same back I suppose. I just don't want to see the project abandoned by petty back and forth edits and reverts. Encourage edit, not discourage edits. Talk page and dispute resolutions with the input of others is favored to the constant revert warring. The pattern needs to change now. --Jpatt 12:19, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu