Changes

:::Ya, but what's your point?  All the conservative Democrats died off.  Roughly 40% of the nation is conservative and wouldn't find a place in today's Democratic party.

:::Ya, but what's your point?  All the conservative Democrats died off.  Roughly 40% of the nation is conservative and wouldn't find a place in today's Democratic party.

:::Moderate Democrats ran against Hillary and Obama in the 2008 primaries, but went nowhere.

:::Moderate Democrats ran against Hillary and Obama in the 2008 primaries, but went nowhere.

:::So much the greater would it be likely that the Democratic party would not support someone belonging to a whole party that was further to the right of these rejected moderates.

:::So much the greater would it be likely that the Democratic party would not support someone belonging to a whole party that was further to the right of these rejected moderates.

:::Conclusion: About 80% of the Right Wing must be conservative, and non-conservative right-wingers are perceived as extreme [within the bounds of conservatism], or at least strange, by conservatives, to whom extremists really ''don't'' appeal.

:::Conclusion: About 80% of the Right Wing must be conservative, and non-conservative right-wingers are perceived as extreme [within the bounds of conservatism], or at least strange, by conservatives, to whom extremists really ''don't'' appeal.

:::Secondly, if there were, say, Rockefeller Republicans, they would want to pretend to be mainstream Republicans rather than have their ideas rejected out of hand or declared out-of-range.

:::Secondly, if there were, say, Rockefeller Republicans, they would want to pretend to be mainstream Republicans rather than have their ideas rejected out of hand or declared out-of-range.

:::Also, there doesn't seem to be any Right-wing extremists [that is, extremism relative to the whole range of political attitudes; a designation shared with radicals or those capable of using unprovoked or planned violence], but the liberal media really needs there to be some.  The closest thing to an extremist Right winger today doesn't have to do with having a compulsion to support their ideas by [the aforesaid] extremist measures or taking their ideas to the extreme, but a Right winger who works tirelessly to support the Right wing—an extremist in volume of support rather than in the aforesaid taking of extremist measures or following extremist ideas.  Some examples of these extreme measures by Democrats are: voter fraud, unsealing court records of candidates or biased news reporting.

:::Also, there doesn't seem to be any Right-wing extremists [that is, extremism relative to the whole range of political attitudes; a designation shared with radicals or those capable of using unprovoked or planned violence], but the liberal media really needs there to be some.  The closest thing to an extremist Right winger today doesn't have to do with having a compulsion to support their ideas by [the aforesaid] extremist measures or taking their ideas to the extreme, but a Right winger who works tirelessly to support the Right wing—an extremist in volume of support rather than in the aforesaid taking of extremist measures or following extremist ideas.  Some examples of these extreme measures by Democrats are: voter fraud, unsealing court records of candidates or biased news reporting.

:::Thirdly, regarding investigating voter fraud, [practically] no one in the Right wing thinks it's a bad thing, but the Left wing will always have someone there to deny it's a problem.  Voters pick up on that, and perhaps realize that the Left wing's opposition isn't really based on trying to apply a practice from the consideration of an abstract concept, but [simply on the belief] that it's always profitable for them to play the odds and assume that the devotion to ethics of conservatives and their imitators will nearly always outweigh their own.

:::Thirdly, regarding investigating voter fraud, [practically] no one in the Right wing thinks it's a bad thing, but the Left wing will always have someone there to deny it's a problem.  Voters pick up on that, and perhaps realize that the Left wing's opposition isn't really based on trying to apply a practice from the consideration of an abstract concept, but [simply on the belief] that it's always profitable for them to play the odds and assume that the devotion to ethics of conservatives and their imitators will nearly always outweigh their own.

:::And so on with the unsealing of court records and biased news reporting.  Due to how outlandish the Left wing's real behavior is, they can bet their right-wing counterparts never would have considered stooping that low, which all-too-often allows the Left's abuses to pass by undetected, unprepared for.

:::And so on with the unsealing of court records and biased news reporting.  Due to how outlandish the Left wing's real behavior is, they can bet their right-wing counterparts never would have considered stooping that low, which all-too-often allows the Left's abuses to pass by undetected, unprepared for.

:::For example, the Obama Administration undertook some unpopular measure that was discussed in the news.  Soon afterwards, the Administration announced its Iran Treaty.  It would have taken some time to read, but—for a while—the common assumption was that Obama was employing a carrot and stick approach.  The great carrot of the Iran treaty would outshine the implementation of the stick to the minor points of contention that preceded it and make the Right Wing look petty.  No one suspected that [the designs employed by President Obama] would make his approach look petty as [they] eventually did.

:::For example, the Obama Administration undertook some unpopular measure that was discussed in the news.  Soon afterwards, the Administration announced its Iran Treaty.  It would have taken some time to read, but—for a while—the common assumption was that Obama was employing a carrot and stick approach.  The great carrot of the Iran treaty would outshine the implementation of the stick to the minor points of contention that preceded it and make the Right Wing look petty.  No one suspected that [the designs employed by President Obama] would make his approach look petty as [they] eventually did.

:::It was revealed that [President Obama's] strategy with the Iran deal was an attempt to overload the Right Wing with multiple [subtle] issues, together with those from the preceding measure, [and to claim a presence of radical imams in Iran, with no evidence, who shared in the Right wing in opposing the treaty.  Thus President Obama and his State Department officers would be portrayed as practical centrists, and, in addition, the President's oppositional attempts would yield the prejudgment of the treaty by interested parties] rather than [the judgment of] the Right Wing [in taking] due consideration [of the merits of the treaty].

:::It was revealed that [President Obama's] strategy with the Iran deal was an attempt to overload the Right Wing with multiple [subtle] issues, together with those from the preceding measure, [and to claim a presence of radical imams in Iran, with no evidence, who shared in the Right wing in opposing the treaty.  Thus President Obama and his State Department officers would be portrayed as practical centrists, and, in addition, the President's oppositional attempts would yield the prejudgment of the treaty by interested parties] rather than [the judgment of] the Right Wing [in taking] due consideration [of the merits of the treaty].

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 09:46, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 09:46, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:19, 15 July 2017 (EDT) Revised.

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:19, 15 July 2017 (EDT) Revised.