Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
mLine 19:
Line 19: − +
→Argument Against Darwinism: Capitalization
*Anthedons<ref>Living Fossils: Anthedons. Joachim Scheven. Creation 17, no 3 (June 1995): 52.[https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/living-fossils/living-fossils-anthedons/]</ref>
*Anthedons<ref>Living Fossils: Anthedons. Joachim Scheven. Creation 17, no 3 (June 1995): 52.[https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/living-fossils/living-fossils-anthedons/]</ref>
==Argument Against Darwinism==
==Argument against Darwinism==
Darwinists acknowledge they have no answer as to why some genera survived unchanged for millions of years while others have supposedly evolved (Ward, Peter. 1992. On Methuselah’s Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York). Margaret Helder reviewed Ward's book in Creation Matters Vol. 3, No. 2 (March/April, 1998).<ref>https://www.creationresearch.org/index.php/extensions/s5-creation-matters/cm-archive?task=document.viewdoc&id=604</ref>
Darwinists acknowledge they have no answer as to why some genera survived unchanged for millions of years while others have supposedly evolved (Ward, Peter. 1992. On Methuselah’s Trail: Living Fossils and the Great Extinctions. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York). Margaret Helder reviewed Ward's book in Creation Matters Vol. 3, No. 2 (March/April, 1998).<ref>https://www.creationresearch.org/index.php/extensions/s5-creation-matters/cm-archive?task=document.viewdoc&id=604</ref>
Similarly, Darwinist M. Afaro acknowledged having no answer in Darwinian theory for the persistence of living fossils.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/why-are-there-still-tuataras</ref>
Similarly, Darwinist M. Afaro acknowledged having no answer in Darwinian theory for the persistence of living fossils.<ref>http://www.icr.org/article/why-are-there-still-tuataras</ref>