Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Talk:Obama's "green" jobs initiative (view source)
Revision as of 03:10, July 29, 2017
, 03:10, July 29, 2017no edit summary
:::I did not remove any part of the program's success. Look at [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_%22green%22_jobs_initiative&curid=123982&diff=1364124&oldid=1364120 the edit]. Maybe ''you'' didn't look closely at the edit and missed that I combined two paragraphs into one while keeping the content and refs. If you really disagree with this, bring it to Andy and try to convince him. If not, then stop arguing. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:45, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
:::I did not remove any part of the program's success. Look at [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_%22green%22_jobs_initiative&curid=123982&diff=1364124&oldid=1364120 the edit]. Maybe ''you'' didn't look closely at the edit and missed that I combined two paragraphs into one while keeping the content and refs. If you really disagree with this, bring it to Andy and try to convince him. If not, then stop arguing. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:45, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
::::The word ‘Success’ is no longer in the article. Under Obama’s direction, this program was an unqualified success. Why is it so hard for conservatives to understand the idea that Obama had some good ideas? --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:06, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
::::The word ‘Success’ is no longer in the article. Under Obama’s direction, this program was an unqualified success. Why is it so hard for conservatives to understand the idea that Obama had some good ideas? --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:06, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::See, you're adding content with a liberal point of view to the article -- you essentially just admitted it. Read the article [[Conservative]]. It explains what conservatism is. CP's point of view aligns with this article. If you still want to fight for your changes, which give undue weight to your content, go to the talk page of the site's owner, [[User talk:Aschlafly]], and try to convince him. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 28 July 2017 (EDT)