Changes

:::::See, you're adding content with a liberal point of view to the article -- you essentially just admitted it. Read the article [[Conservative]]. It explains what conservatism is. CP's point of view aligns with this article. If you still want to fight for your changes, which gives undue weight to your content, go to the talk page of the site's owner, [[User talk:Aschlafly]], and try to convince him. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

:::::See, you're adding content with a liberal point of view to the article -- you essentially just admitted it. Read the article [[Conservative]]. It explains what conservatism is. CP's point of view aligns with this article. If you still want to fight for your changes, which gives undue weight to your content, go to the talk page of the site's owner, [[User talk:Aschlafly]], and try to convince him. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

::::::And I thought I was implying Obama utilized some conservative ideas when governing America. You know, assisting private enterprise to stimulate the economy. Rather like Reagan. [http://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/15/us/reagan-plan-to-privatize-government-is-gaining-support-from-democrats.html?pagewanted=all]--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:22, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

::::::And I thought I was implying Obama utilized some conservative ideas when governing America. You know, assisting private enterprise to stimulate the economy. Rather like Reagan. [http://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/15/us/reagan-plan-to-privatize-government-is-gaining-support-from-democrats.html?pagewanted=all]--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:22, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

:::::::Just because Reagan did something does not mean it was a right decision -- citing Reagan is not a good strategy for liberals to use. But this is getting beside the point. I removed the undue weight of your edit by removing the header, and I made it more concise. We don't need to call it a "success" (a pov term) -- the statistics are enough. I already made clear to you where you should go if you want to appeal. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

:::::::Just because Reagan did something does not mean it was a right decision -- citing Reagan is ''not'' a good strategy for liberals to use, and it shows how little they know about conservatives. But this is getting beside the point. I removed the undue weight of your edit by removing the header, and I made it more concise. We don't need to call it a "success" (a pov term) -- the statistics are enough. I already made clear to you where you should go if you want to appeal. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)