Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
:::::::Just because Reagan did something does not mean it was a right decision -- citing Reagan is ''not'' a good strategy for liberals to use, and it shows how little they know about conservatives. But this is getting beside the point. I removed the undue weight of your edit by removing the header, and I made it more concise. We don't need to call it a "success" (a pov term) -- the statistics are enough. I already made clear to you where you should go if you want to appeal. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::::Just because Reagan did something does not mean it was a right decision -- citing Reagan is ''not'' a good strategy for liberals to use, and it shows how little they know about conservatives. But this is getting beside the point. I removed the undue weight of your edit by removing the header, and I made it more concise. We don't need to call it a "success" (a pov term) -- the statistics are enough. I already made clear to you where you should go if you want to appeal. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::Conservatives, like myself, tend to cite Reagan quite frequently. The man obviously had faults, that much is certain, but since he had a significant impact on America it makes sense to talk about the man. You seem to despise POV terms, might you edit the first two paragraphs to remove the rampant POV usage? Terms like ‘so-called’, ‘failures’, ‘cronyism’, and ‘rampant’.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:40, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::Conservatives, like myself, tend to cite Reagan quite frequently. The man obviously had faults, that much is certain, but since he had a significant impact on America it makes sense to talk about the man. You seem to despise POV terms, might you edit the first two paragraphs to remove the rampant POV usage? Terms like ‘so-called’, ‘failures’, ‘cronyism’, and ‘rampant’.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:40, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::The first two paragraphs are good. Most the terms you have a problem with are related to the Heritage Foundation report on them. The terms are directly related to the report, which found the program was not doing well. There is no reason to believe the report is inappropriate to be cited. Once again, if you wish to appeal, you know where to go. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 07:29, 29 July 2017 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu