100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 355:
Line 355: + + + + + +
→The Imaginary Catalyst
I believe this because I believe both the scientists and the philosophers. They both are experts in their fields. Neither party is dishonest. Additionally, I have limited and anecdotal and experiential evidence that this it is possible to affect ''g'' and to commune with ''g'' on some level. I rely upon the scientific method. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:30, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
I believe this because I believe both the scientists and the philosophers. They both are experts in their fields. Neither party is dishonest. Additionally, I have limited and anecdotal and experiential evidence that this it is possible to affect ''g'' and to commune with ''g'' on some level. I rely upon the scientific method. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:30, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, we do agree on those points. I would just like to add that i do not see most things as normal, i do see them as miraculous, the difference being that you attribute them to a sentient ''g'' while I attribute it simply to the way things have happened.
:Your idea that if we understood ''g'' we would be able to manipulate those elements is intruiging. I cannot wait to see if scientists do manage to understand ''g'' in some way and are then able to do those things, although of course, the results could be potentially catastrophic.
:Finally, just as a matter of definition, I am not strictly an atheist. I refer to myself as such, as the majority of religious believers understand my position in relation to theirs easier then if I say "I'm an agnostic, verging on atheistic but still open to solid evidence for the existence of god." For them, that is an atheist. [[User:Bolly Ottihw|Bolly Ottihw]] 19:17, 30 April 2007
==Let Me Paint a Picture==
==Let Me Paint a Picture==