SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: − [[Activist judges]], including those on the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] proclaimed that teaching [[creationism]]<ref>https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html</ref> and [[intelligent design]]<ref>http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf</ref>{{dead link}} in public schools is unconstitutional because they claim that such teachings would amount to a government establishment of religion, which is prohibited by the First Amendment.<ref>''See'' ''Kitzmiller'', 400 F.Supp.2d at 765</ref> Hypocritically, nothing has been done to remove the religions of Secular Humanism and Islam from the schools.+
Public schools in the United States (view source)
Revision as of 01:05, July 31, 2017
, 01:05, July 31, 2017judges who are not "activist" judges also rule this way due to long-standing precedents
==Suppression and intolerance of alternative views==
==Suppression and intolerance of alternative views==
The U.S. Supreme Court proclaimed that teaching [[creationism]]<ref>https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html</ref> and [[intelligent design]]<ref>http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf</ref>{{dead link}} in public schools is unconstitutional because they claim that such teachings would amount to a government establishment of religion, which is prohibited by the First Amendment.<ref>''See'' ''Kitzmiller'', 400 F.Supp.2d at 765</ref> Hypocritically, nothing has been done to remove the religions of Secular Humanism and Islam from the schools.
==Educational outcomes==
==Educational outcomes==