852
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 98:
Line 98: + +
→To "Sir" or not to "Sir"
:My my, you disagree with a lot of things. Also, knighthoods are different, and especially back then. I call Isaac Newton Sir Isaac Newton, because he earned it, and he would have wanted himself called that, and we should defer to that as a means of respect-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:43, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
:My my, you disagree with a lot of things. Also, knighthoods are different, and especially back then. I call Isaac Newton Sir Isaac Newton, because he earned it, and he would have wanted himself called that, and we should defer to that as a means of respect-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:43, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
::I've always refered to him and known him as Sir Isaac Newton, but silly me, I got that from all my physics text books here in America. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 11:18, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==