Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + +
should we be able to openly discuss and be informed by some of the real psychological sex differences that might account for variation in men’s and women’s workplace performance?
Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge called it a
Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge called it a
*good-faith effort to discuss differences between men and women in tech<ref> [http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-11/james-damore-explains-why-i-was-fired-google James Damore: "This Is Why I Was Fired By Google"] - ZeroHedge</ref>
*good-faith effort to discuss differences between men and women in tech<ref> [http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-11/james-damore-explains-why-i-was-fired-google James Damore: "This Is Why I Was Fired By Google"] - ZeroHedge</ref>
Geoffrey Miller, an evolutionary psychology professor at University of New Mexico wrote:
*Within this sea of gender bias, should Google use various practices (affirmative action is not just one thing) to especially encourage capable women of joining (and enjoying) the Google workplace? I vote yes. At the same time, should we be able to openly discuss and be informed by some of the real psychological sex differences that might account for variation in men’s and women’s workplace performance? In the right context, I vote yes to that, too.<ref> [http://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond/ The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond] - Quillette</ref>
A pseudonymous poster wrote:
A pseudonymous poster wrote: