Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
106 bytes added ,  15:45, April 30, 2007
Line 5: Line 5:  
Can you explain how a Professor of Geriatric Medicine is an expert in psychology( or even science--as opposed to medicine or geriatrics)?  If not I really think that reference is inappropriate and should be removed. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:39, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Can you explain how a Professor of Geriatric Medicine is an expert in psychology( or even science--as opposed to medicine or geriatrics)?  If not I really think that reference is inappropriate and should be removed. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:39, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Now he is being used to support mere gossip.  Weakening the claim does not make him a better source for its veracity, but it does make the claim entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. “Some have charged X with Y” is nothing but gossip and should be immediately removed as it violates the commandments.  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 11:49, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Now he is being used to support mere gossip.  Weakening the claim does not make him a better source for its veracity, but it does make the claim entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. “Some have charged X with Y” is nothing but gossip and should be immediately removed as it violates the commandments.  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 11:49, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Seeing no explanation, I will remove it as gossip.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 11:45, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Popper ==
 
== Popper ==
553

edits

Navigation menu